← 返回任务列表

2013年股东大会 · 巴菲特为何投资IBM,它有什么护城河?

23 段 · 1 位说话人 · 原片 2:12
M1
M10:00

来自日本东京的 Chris Yu。

Chris Yu from Tokyo, Japan.

你能不能再多讲一点关于投资 IBM 这件事?

Can you talk a little bit more about the IBM investment?

你觉得这家公司护城河在哪里?

Where do you see the moat for that business?

顺便完整披露一下,我是在 Microsoft 工作的。

And just in the spirit of full disclosure, I work for Microsoft.

对,你的问题是——你刚才问的是——哪家公司的护城河?

Yeah, was your question— what was your— the moat around which business?

IBM。

IBM.

哦,IBM。

Oh, IBM.

嗯,我会说,我对 IBM 护城河的理解,没有我对 Coca-Cola 护城河的理解那么深。

Well, I would say that I do not understand the moat around an IBM as well as I understand the moat around a Coca-Cola.

我觉得我对它是有一些理解的,但要说信心的话,不管是 Coca-Cola、Wrigley,还是 Heinz,它们的护城河都比 IBM 更让我有把握。

I think I have some understanding of it, but I feel I would have more conviction about the moat around a Coca-Cola or a Wrigley or a Heinz, for that matter, than an IBM.

不过,我对 IBM 的感觉已经足够好了,所以我们在它上面投了相当大的一笔钱。

But I feel good enough about IBM that we put a considerable amount of money in it.

而且,没有任何事情会妨碍你刚才提到的 Microsoft 和 IBM 同时取得成功。

And there's nothing that precludes both Microsoft, which you mentioned, and IBM being successful.

事实上,我希望它们两家都成功。

In fact, I hope they both are.

我们对 IBM 所处位置的判断有足够的信心,所以我们建了一个非常大的仓位。

We have got enough conviction about IBM's position that we took a very large position.

我喜欢他们的财务政策。

I like their financial policies.

我觉得,他们长期维持强势地位的概率是很高的,但我对这一点的信心程度并没有那么高。

I think the odds are good that their position is maintained in a strong way over time, but I don't feel the same degree of conviction about that.

不像我对 BNSF Railroad 那样有把握。

As I do about the BNSF Railroad.

我的意思是,你知道,对我来说,很难想出 BNSF 会出什么岔子。

I mean, you know, it's very hard for me to think of anything that can go wrong with BNSF.

但 IBM 可能出问题的地方,我是能想到一些的。

I can think of some things that can go wrong with IBM.

顺便说一句,他们还有一笔非常大的养老金义务。

They incidentally have a very large pension obligation.

当然,他们也有一个很大的养老金基金,但你说的是七百五十亿到八百亿美元规模的资产和负债。你知道,这相当于旁边还带着一家很大的年金公司,而在年金这个领域,事情的发展有时候会很出人意料。

Now, they have a large pension fund too, but you're talking $75 or $80 billion of assets and liabilities that, you know, is a big— it is a big annuity company on the side, and you can have— balls can take funny bounces in the annuity field.

我宁可他们没有这个问题,但这是我买入时会纳入考虑的一个事实。

I would rather they didn't have that, but that is a fact that I take into consideration when I buy.

他们账上显示资产和负债大致相等,但长期来看,负债要比资产确定得多。

They show the assets and liabilities as being roughly equal, but the liabilities are a lot more certain than the assets over time.

Charlie?

Charlie?