← 返回任务列表

2002年股东大会 · 巴菲特手把手教你如何挑选指数基金

72 段 · 3 位说话人 · 原片 6:53
M1
M10:00

早上好。

Good morning.

我叫 Ted Friedman。

My name is Ted Friedman.

我来自 Ohio 州的 Cincinnati。

I'm from Cincinnati, Ohio.

你在一九九六年的年报里说过,对大多数投资者来说,持有普通股最好的方式,是买收费最低的指数基金。

You said in the 1996 annual report that most investors will find that the best way to own common stocks is in an index fund that charges minimal fees.

我有两个问题。

Two questions.

第一,现在有很多不同的指数基金,持有的股票组合也都不一样。

First, there are a lot of different index funds that hold different baskets of stocks.

你自己会用什么标准,或者会建议别人用什么标准,来挑选合适的指数基金?

What criteria would you use, or recommend, to select an appropriate index fund?

第二,S&P 500 的市盈率明显高于它的历史平均水平。

Second, the price-to-earnings ratio of the S&P 500 is significantly higher than its historical average.

那投资者在买入这个指数的时候,应该用什么基准来判断?

What benchmark should an investor use in purchasing this index?
M2
M20:52

对,关于指数基金,我会说,我会,我会直接选一个覆盖面很广的指数。

Yeah, I would say that, in terms of the index fund, I would, I would just take a very broad index.

我会选 S&P 500,前提是我不是一次性把所有钱都投进去。

I would take the S&P 500, as long as I wasn't putting all my money in at one time.

如果我要在二十年或者三十年的时间里,按相对平均的金额持续往指数基金里投钱,我就会选一只基金。

If I were going to put money into an index fund in relatively equal amounts over a 20- or 30-year period, I would pick a fund.

我知道 Vanguard 的费用非常低。

And I know Vanguard has very low costs.

我相信还有很多其他家也是这样。

I'm sure there are a whole bunch of others that do.

只是我没有专门去研究这个领域。

I just haven't looked at the field.

但我会非常留意相关的费用,因为他们为你做的事情,其实就只是买入那个指数。

But I would be very careful about the costs involved, because all they're doing for you is buying that index.

我觉得,平均来说,买这些指数基金的人,结果会比那些买高费用基金的人更好,因为这就是个数学问题。

I think that the people who buy those index funds on average will get better results than the people that buy funds that have higher costs attached to them, because it's just a matter of math.

如果有很大一部分资金是由机构来管理,而很多机构收费很高,另外一些收费很低,那它们拿到的毛收益会非常接近,但净收益会不一样。

If you have a very high percentage of funds being institutionally managed, and a great many institutions charge a lot of money for doing it and others charge a little, they're going to get very similar gross results but different net results.

我也建议你们所有人去读一下 John——John Bogle 在过去五年里写的几本书,我现在说不出书名,但那些书都非常好。

And I recommend to all of you reading John— John Bogle's written a couple of books in the last five years, and I can't give you the titles, but they're very good books.

任何投资基金的人,在投资之前都应该先读读那些书;如果你已经投了,还是应该去读。

And anybody investing in funds should read those books before investing, or if you've already invested, you still should read the books.

说真的,关于基金投资,你需要知道的基本都在里面了。

And it's all you need to know really about fund investing.

所以我会选一个宽基指数,但我不会在某一个时间点一下子扔进去一大笔。

So I would pick a broad index, but I wouldn't toss a chunk in at any one time.

我会拉长时间慢慢投,因为指数基金的本质就是,你是在说,我认为 America 的企业在长期来看会有还不错的表现。

I would do it over a period of time because the very nature of index funds is that you are saying, I think America's business is going to do well over— reasonably well over a long period of time.

但我没有足够的本事去挑出赢家,我也没有足够的本事去挑对进场时机。

But I don't know enough to pick the winners, and I don't know enough to pick the winning times.

这没什么问题。

There's nothing wrong with that.

我就是没那个本事去选准时机。

I don't know enough to pick the winning times.

偶尔我觉得自己有足够把握能挑中一个赢家,但这种情况并不多。

Occasionally, I think I know enough to pick a winner, but not very often.

而且我当然也不可能把整张名单从头看到尾,然后说,这个是赢家,那个不是,诸如此类。

And I certainly can't pick winners by going down through the whole list and saying, this is a winner and this isn't, and so on.

所以,重要的是,如果你整体上觉得,长期来看,把钱放在企业里是个合理的选择,那你就应该在很长一段时间里持续投资,而不是在某一个时点一次性投进一大笔,等于是在暗中押注时机。

So the important thing to do, if you have an overall feeling that business is a reasonable place to have your money over a long period of time, is to invest over a long period of time and not make any bet implicitly by putting a big chunk in at a given time.

至于什么时候该买、什么时候不该买,我不觉得这里面有什么特别高明的判断标准。

As to the criteria as to when you should or shouldn't, I don't think there are any great criteria on that.

我不认为市盈率,你知道,能决定这些事。

I don't think price-earnings ratio, you know, determines things.

我不认为市净率、市销率——我不认为任何——在我看来,没有任何一个单一指标是我能给你的,或者别人能给你的,来告诉你现在是不是买股票的好时机,或者不该买股票,或者类似这种事。

I don't think price-book ratios, price-sales ratios— I don't think any— there's no single metric I can give you, or that anyone else can give you, in my view, that will tell you this is a great time to buy stocks or not to buy stocks or anything of the sort.

事情没那么简单。

It just isn't that easy.

所以你才去买指数基金,所以你才要拉长时间、持续去买。

That's why you go to an index fund, and that's why you buy over a period of time.

没那么简单。

It isn't that easy.

不简单。

Easy.

你靠看杂志是学不会这个的。

You can't get it by reading a magazine.

你靠看电视,你知道,也弄不明白这个。

You can't get it by, you know, watching television.

你当然很希望有这么个东西会告诉你,你知道,我是说,就是说,如果 P/E 在十二倍或以下,或者某个数字以下,你就买;如果在二十五倍或以上,你就卖。

You can't— you'd love to have something that said, you know, I mean, that, that, you know, if P/Es are 12 or below or some number, you buy, and if they're 25 or above, you sell.

但——事情不是这么运作的。

It is— it doesn't work that way.

这,这,这比那要复杂得多。

It's, it's, it's a more complex business than that.

你想想就知道,这事不可能那么容易。

It couldn't be that easy when you think about it.

嗯,所以如果你买的是指数基金,你其实是在保护自己,不受你不知道这些问题答案这个事实的影响;但与此同时,你也相信,就算不知道这些问题的答案,只要你清楚地认识到这一点,长期下来你依然能做得不错。

Uh, so if you are buying an index fund, you are protecting yourself against the fact that you don't know the answers to those questions, but that you think you can do well over time without knowing the answers to those questions, as long as you consciously recognize that, that fact.

还有,嗯,你知道,我会——如果你是年轻人,而且你打算长期持续把收入中的一部分存下来,我会说,就选一个覆盖面非常广的指数。

And, um, you know, I would— if you're a young person and you intend to save a portion of your income over time, I just say just pick out a very broad index.

我大概会用 S&P 500,因为我觉得你一旦再往外扩,就会开始想着这次是不是该配 small caps,下次是不是该配 large caps,或者买某一类 foreign stock。

And I would, I would probably use the S&P 500 because I think if you start getting beyond that, you start starting to think you should be in small caps this time and large caps that time, or this kind of foreign stock.

而你一旦这么做了,你知道,你就进入了一个你并不了解、说老实话你也没那个能力去玩的游戏。

And as soon as you do that, you know, you're in a game you don't know, you know, you're not equipped to play, in all candor.

这就是我的建议。

That would be my recommendation on it.
M3
M34:38

Charlie?

Charlie?

我觉得他的第二个担心是,普通股的价格可能会涨得太高,以至于如果你去买指数基金,你也不会指望能有多好的回报。

I think his second worry is that common stocks could become so high-priced that if you bought index funds, you wouldn't expect to do very well.

我以前觉得我可能活不到看到这种事变得很可能发生的时候,但现在我觉得这事也许真的会发生。

I didn't think I'd live long enough to think that was likely to happen, but now I think that may happen.
M2
M24:59

不过你在这里大概是说,它们——它们可能会到一个那样的水平,而且——它们还得在那样的水平上持续很长一段时间。

But probably what you're saying there is that you— they could get to a level and be at— they'd have to be at a sustained level like that for a long time.
M3
M35:06

它们可能会到那个位置,而且会在那儿待很久。

They could be there and stay there for a long time.
M2
M25:09

那样的话,你可能也就是赚百分之三到百分之四。

In which case you might make 3 or 4%.

但在那种情况下,难道还会有比这好得多的别的选择吗?

But would there be anything way better than that around under those circumstances anyway?

还有,请把花生脆糖递给我。

And pass the peanut brittle, please.
M3
M35:22

嗯,在 Japan,类似这种情况就发生过,过去大概十三年左右,持有一个不错的指数,回报是负的。

Well, in Japan, where something like this happened, the return from owning a nice index over the last 13 years or so is negative.

像这么糟糕的事,会不会也发生在这里?

Can something as horrible as that happen here?

我的意思是,这有可能吗?

I mean, is it conceivable?

我觉得答案是,有可能。

I think the answer is yes.
M2
M25:44

不过在 Japan,当然,你的另一个选择是把钱存银行,或者持有 Japanese bonds,收益率大概在百分之零到百分之一,或者百分之一点五之间。

But the option in Japan, of course, is to have deposits in a bank or own Japanese bonds at somewhere between 0% and 1% or 1.5%.

所以,如果所有东西的利率都变得非常低,也就意味着股票会卖得非常贵,那你知道,这就说明你所处的是一个跟二十年、三十年前不一样的世界。那时候通常资本能拿到更好的回报。

So if rates on everything get very low, which means stocks sell very high, you know, then it just means that you live in a different world than existed 20 or 30 years ago when generally capital got paid better.
M3
M36:12

我得说,我们的包装做得非常好。

I must say that we have very good packaging.

对。

Yeah.
M1
M16:21

对。

Yeah.
M2
M26:23

一般来说,他讲这个的时候会更随意一点,不过他今天表现得特别规矩。

Normally, he does this in a less formal manner, but he's on his good behavior today.
M3
M36:30

我们是在维护 peanut brittle 的完整性。

We're protecting the integrity of the peanut brittle.
M2
M26:33

这倒是真的。

That is true.
M3
M36:33

这个包装——

The packaging—.
M2
M26:35

你知道,任何带 butter 的东西,本质上都是一做好就开始走下坡路。

The nature of anything with butter in it, you know, is that it starts going downhill.

从你把它做出来的那一刻起就是这样。

From the moment you make it.

所以,为了达到 Charlie 和我坚持的质量标准,这个包装必须得非常出色。

And, and therefore, this packaging has to be extraordinary in order to meet the quality standards that Charlie and I insist on.

好,我们转到 Zone 5。

Okay, we'll go to Zone 5.